Das Stück stammt aus der Auktion Dr. Busso Peus Nachf., Auktion 398, 28.04.2009, Los Nr. 1920.

Das Stück stammt aus der Auktion Dr. Busso Peus Nachf. Auktion 287, 18.-20.03.1975, Los Nr. 520.

Das Stück stammt aus der Auktion Dr. Busso Peus Nachf., Auktion 398, 29.04.2009, Los Nr. 1925, davor aus der Sammlung Herbert A. Cahn, Münzen und Medaillen AG Basel, Auktion 87, 04.06.1998, Los Nr. 289.

Das Stück stammt aus der Sammlung Herbert A. Cahn, Münzen und Medaillen AG Basel, Auktion 87, 04.06.1998, Los Nr. 289.

Das Stück stammt aus der Auktion Adolph Hess AG Luzern, 18./19.09.1984, Los Nr. 242.

Das Exemplar stammt aus der Auktion Dr. Busso Peus Nachf., Auktion 287, 18.-20.03.1975, Los Nr. 652.

I think 109 not 107

Since I am the former possessor, I can swear that this coin is one and the same coin as the linked coin of the NAC sale.

The item was bought by me from cgb.fr and at the time of the purchase, there was sealing on the surface. Somebody might have applied it for the purpose of concealing especially the flan cracks even though it implied blurring the details. The sealing was removed via solvents by a professional restorer, who additionally exposed the details. At the point of time, the coin was photographed at NAC, both the flan cracks and the details are clearly visible.

Withdrawn, Slavey replica.

Erreur de description :
Constance II
A/ D N CONSTAN-TIVS PF AVG
R/ VOTIS/XXX/MVLTIS/XXXX // •SIRM•
Silique lourde (Argenteus) 355-358 - RIC 66 - RSC 154†c

Gordianus III, not Severus Alexander.

Hast doch Recht gehabt. Wird auch auf der Fake Seite von Ancient Forum coins prima dargestellt.
Echt besten Dank für die Nachricht.

It's a Slavey replica.

Wird diese Münze nicht in Thompson in Essays Robinson 118 erwähnt?

Coin is fake. Tamar irregular coppers doesnot have such ornament around main monogram. both circles in " hearts" must touch each other ! and together they make something like lying "8" and not such ugly ornament. . Rusudan countermark is also totally fake. And, how cannot you see that clear part on the backside is not a countermark trace, but completely artificially made !

Cast fake, artificially aged.

Twins:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1860057
https://numismaticfakes.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/petra-cast-fake-selin959-ebay-june-2016.jpg?w=700
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/albums/userpics/31686/Petra_fakes.jpg

Source: https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/16/the-fake-coinage-of-petra/

Modern forgery from modern dies (wrong style, pressed).

Forgery, struck by modern fake dies, transferred using this one as host coin: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1209940

Another fake sample from same dies here:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1704916

Source:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/14/the-fake-coinage-of-lipara-part-iv/

Forgery, struck by modern fake dies, transferred using this one as host coin: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1209940

Another fake sample from same dies here:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1937173

Source:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/14/the-fake-coinage-of-lipara-part-iv/

Cast fake.

Twins:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2161134
https://numismaticfakes.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/adranon-ae-unit-dog.jpg

Source:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/the-fake-coinage-of-mamertini/

Cast fake.

Twins:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2979006
https://numismaticfakes.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/adranon-ae-unit-dog.jpg

Source:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/the-fake-coinage-of-mamertini/

Cast fake.

Twins:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1780484
https://numismaticfakes.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/mamertini-quadrupla-crippa-numismatica.jpg

Source:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/the-fake-coinage-of-mamertini/

Fake, struck by modern dies on a real ancient flan.

For discussion and other samples see:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/the-fake-coinage-of-mamertini/

Wrong weight, too low for the Pentonkion (here the genuine specimen that inspired the forger: http://numismatics.org/collection/1944.100.10008)

Wrong style, as pointed out here: http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-15477

Source: https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/the-fake-coinage-of-mamertini/

Fake, struck by modern dies.

For discussion and other samples see:
https://numismaticfakes.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/the-fake-coinage-of-mamertini/

Wrong weight for the Pentonkion (here the genuine specimen that inspired the forger: http://numismatics.org/collection/1944.100.10008)

Wrong style, as pointed out here: http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-15477

This is a fake as listed in Price as F97. Price 1781 has a star!