acsearch.info

Cookies must be activated for full functionality of this website.
Please follow the instructions on how to enable Cookies in your web browser.

Comments

  lazooro 18. Oct. 2016, 17:17

Good eye Baka
  Bacon 18. Oct. 2016, 17:01

Recycled as lot 1850 at Action Rauch November 2016 without mention of rubbing (frotado) and heavy hairlines.
  Pscipio 11. Oct. 2016, 22:39

Pressed from modern dies.
  Tejas554 9. Oct. 2016, 20:55

The Reference to Friedrich Stefan No. 5 is misleading, as Stefan is showing a silver quartersiliqua. The coin is almost certainly a modern forgery.
  aurumercur 5. Oct. 2016, 17:18

Not Apollonia but Dyrrhachium
  siliquae 30. Sept. 2016, 04:41

Faux moderne, répertorié aux FAC (http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-7521). De nombreuses siliques de mêmes coins de droits et de revers ont été vendues comme des vraies ces dernières années.
  CaptainMyCaptain 26. Sept. 2016, 23:12

Philip III. V over monogram = Philip III.Looks like F-oD variety. Best bet is F. Very early 1600s or very very late 1500's (1599)
  Roxburgh 12. Sept. 2016, 23:50

This has year 2 not 3.
  CaptainMyCaptain 12. Sept. 2016, 04:04

potosi. not lima
  CaptainMyCaptain 11. Sept. 2016, 12:17

1622 as 16ZZ.
  lazooro 4. Sept. 2016, 13:01

Yes it is Philip V 1736
  CaptainMyCaptain 2. Sept. 2016, 00:53

cleary not lima, and cleary not Luis I.
  siliquae 1. Sept. 2016, 17:59

RIC 37, official.
  Gabriel43 29. Aug. 2016, 18:22

Ce n'est pas Perpignan, mais Saint Pourçain.
Point 11°,
comme les deux autres indiquées.
Perpignan a un P au centre de la croix du revers.
  rpbt 22. Aug. 2016, 12:59

Probably a hemilitron; too large and heavy for a hexas.
  rpbt 22. Aug. 2016, 12:56

A Pentonkion rather than a hexas; five dots on the reverse as marks of value, and also too heavy for a hexas.
  coinscollector 14. Aug. 2016, 19:27

Very interesting comment. However I did a mirror photo effect of your dies and it doesn't look like this coin. Many cracks and holes even the description looks different . I am not implying you are wrong, however to make your statement more reliable, can you post of photo with a wax or clay in-print of your dies ?
regards
  alsadeekalsadouk 12. Aug. 2016, 14:07

posthumous issues not true
  alsadeekalsadouk 12. Aug. 2016, 12:42

by the way it is nice mint and some secrets on that mint, ΣΕ monogram on the neck, looks city mint like alexander one
  Valbona 29. July 2016, 22:19

Looks like an addax antelope. This would make it very unusual.
  CaptainMyCaptain 29. July 2016, 18:59

Mexico is, technically not south America.....its North....
Anyway. I am not seeing the date sadly.
  CaptainMyCaptain 29. July 2016, 18:56

this is why I hate NGC grading cobs. Constant screw ups. This is 1672 not 1612. Not only that, you can not put a grade for milled coinage on cobs! They will never receive the same accolades. Crack that sucker out.
  CaptainMyCaptain 29. July 2016, 18:53

1713
  CaptainMyCaptain 29. July 2016, 18:51

fake. has a small marking of some kind bottom left, obverse. "Replica"? Copy?
  CaptainMyCaptain 29. July 2016, 18:43

1713 type