I don't think that this attribution to Gundobad is correct. There are two monogram types recorded for Gundobad, the more common GVB monogram and the rarer and earlier monogram including prominent letters B-D, but really including all letters of his name.

This is not a Seleucid era coin. This is a quadrans of Gaza struck under Hadrian in 130/1 AD! Obverse : MEINWC, Minos standing left holding long branch; Reverse: GAZA / BEPI, Branch, Gaza symbol.

Le mot " ESSAI " n'est pas sur cette pièce.
Je posséde une pièce Identique sans le mot "ESSAI"..quelle est sa valeur ?
Merci.

This coin is a modern cast forgery, sorry.

http://forgerynetwork.com/asset.aspx?mode=6Q/zOXMHeZ0=&id=DU3ip19Xx3I=

This very same coin was then lot n. 482 at Numsimatica Genevensis Auction VIII, 25 November 2014

This very same coin is lot 475 at Numismatica Genevensis auction VIII, November 25, 2014

This is a coin of Charles the Simple not an emperor Charles. The title is REX not AVG. The spelling DEI instead of D-I ties it to the time just after Eudes. An important coin.

Apollo, naked, standing in front of burning altar, holding patera and a branch, E to centre right
Consular legate, Pontianus, (Governor) of the people of Markianopolis – Good fortune to the inhabitants of this city

The little x between the letters T and V show that this a late issue of Charles the Bald or an early one of Charles the Simple and not of Charlemagne.

RIC 942, not 944. (944 has a yoke of oxen left on the reverse)

A replica from modern dies.

Rarity??

CORIOSOLITE Class IV Group G of series X ?

ungarischen Denaren.

Has this item sold?

Has this item sold?

This coin had been previously offered four times at Heritage:
as lot 25155 officially sold for $ 25,300 on Jan 3, 2012;
as lot 22737 on Jan 7, 2013;
as lot 25562 on Apr 19, 2013 and
as lot 25838 on on Sept 27, 2013

Aegean Numismatics. I acquired this coin in September 2014. It was in an NGC Slab Ch VF 4/5 and 5/5. Posted for sale on www.vcoins.com/aegean in October 2014

Currently in the Charley Rhodes Collection.

I have trouble with accepting this piece as legitimate. The style of the portrait on the obverse and the image of Athena on the reverse are stylistically different than from antiquity. They resemble more Baroque creations from the middle of the eighteenth century than from the third century BC.
The block "A" also concerns me, once again totally different than seen from the third century BC.
Have there been any others of this type discovered?

date at coin is 1708, but search show item as a 1704 DENGA.

Nice

Cheap one to be honest

The wrong description seems to be linked to this image.

310 euros sans frais