A rare variation without the letter O and end of the word
Quint in the date. Should read "QUINTO"
tibor
31. Aug. 2014, 22:24
A cataloging error. The date is 1419.
tibor
31. Aug. 2014, 22:21
A very nice example of the first collectible Early Dated coin. The
lucky winner got a bargain!!
Motleyblue
29. Aug. 2014, 20:02
Wrong coin/despcription
Jelle
27. Aug. 2014, 21:04
This example is a forgery
Bacon
26. Aug. 2014, 21:23
This same coin is being offered at Nomisma auction 51 as lot 434, starting at €. 100,000, which represents a more than 100% increase as compared to the price realized 5 months earlier at Baldwin's auction of the Lindèn collection.
Nerone
25. Aug. 2014, 11:38
Es ist ein Tremissis der Ostgoten. Wohl Mzst. Mailand. vgl. Metlich 2004 für die Büstenform. Legende der Rückseite fehlerhaft (VICTORIA AVCVSTORAM (z.T. retrograd?)
alsadeekalsadouk
19. Aug. 2014, 21:31
coorect date . not true
1234
18. Aug. 2014, 08:00
Great Zeus.
1234
18. Aug. 2014, 08:00
Excellent reverse style! Certainly one of the finest!
alsadeekalsadouk
15. Aug. 2014, 20:13
first 2 letter damged
alsadeekalsadouk
15. Aug. 2014, 20:12
it is 190 not 170
corsaire02
13. Aug. 2014, 12:10
j ai trouvé la meme , et aimerai la vendre .
Ulfino
12. Aug. 2014, 15:17
Endlich kommt wieder so ein ähnlich schönes Stück in der Hess Divo Herbstauktion 2014.
Pscipio
9. Aug. 2014, 10:02
A modern cast fake, known to me in several specimens.
Tejas554
6. Aug. 2014, 19:56
I was the buyer of this coin. Unfortunately, it was stolen in a burglary and is still missing.
Tejas554
6. Aug. 2014, 19:51
This is probably a modern fantasy coin.
Tejas554
6. Aug. 2014, 19:50
This is probably a modern fantasy coin.
Brutus2345
3. Aug. 2014, 00:26
Nice
mazdaro
2. Aug. 2014, 11:57
Trotz Überprägungsspuren ein wunderschönes Stück, bei dem eindeutig die Jahreszahl 637 zu lesen ist! Da sich die 7 und die 9 (Diwani-Schrift) zum Verwechseln ähnlich sehen, kommt es häufig zu diesem speziellen Lesefehler, vor dem selbst Bedoukian nicht gefeit war.
geranioj11
31. July 2014, 09:59
This coin seems to be dated 37-8 A.D.? I do not see TRP IIII? Just wondering.
geranioj11
31. July 2014, 09:57
The only known pre-principate coinage of Caligula on any coin. Very Historical piece.Tiberius and Caligula pre-principate
For problems with the dating of Tiberian Coinage see RPC and A. Banti and L. Simonetti, Corpus Nummorum Romanorum (XIII Florence: 1977 pp. 141-50 deal with dating to 34 A.D. (PolliniJWAG, note 28 for more explanation. Also: “Aspects of the Principate of Tiberius”, Historical comments on the Colonial coinage issued outside Spain, Michael Grant- The American Numismatic Society – Numismatic Notes and Monographs(1950) There are some issues with inscriptions and dating in Banti Simonetti.
These are the only coins that show a portrait of Caligula pre-principate! The coin is dated to maybe 32-33? RPC 182. The importance of this coin is invaluable towards any study of Caligulan pre-principate portraiture. There are no pre-principate portraits (sculpted) of Caligula excepted by Art historians. C · CAESAR · TI · N · QVINQ · IN · V · I · N · K ·
Joe Geranio
Julio Claudian Iconographic Association
geranioj11
31. July 2014, 09:48
The only known pre-principate coinage of Caligula on any coin. Very Historical piece. RPC 184 Tiberius and Caligula pre-principate
For problems with the dating of Tiberian Coinage see RPC and A. Banti and L. Simonetti, Corpus Nummorum Romanorum (XIII Florence: 1977 pp. 141-50 deal with dating to 34 A.D. (PolliniJWAG, note 28 for more explanation. Also: “Aspects of the Principate of Tiberius”, Historical comments on the Colonial coinage issued outside Spain, Michael Grant- The American Numismatic Society – Numismatic Notes and Monographs(1950) There are some issues with inscriptions and dating in Banti Simonetti.
These are the only coins that show a portrait of Caligula pre-principate! The coin is dated to maybe 32-33? RPC 182. The importance of this coin is invaluable towards any study of Caligulan pre-principate portraiture. There are no pre-principate portraits (sculpted) of Caligula excepted by Art historians. C · CAESAR · TI · N · QVINQ · IN · V · I · N · K ·
Joe Geranio
Julio Claudian Iconographic Association
Quint in the date. Should read "QUINTO"
lucky winner got a bargain!!
For problems with the dating of Tiberian Coinage see RPC and A. Banti and L. Simonetti, Corpus Nummorum Romanorum (XIII Florence: 1977 pp. 141-50 deal with dating to 34 A.D. (PolliniJWAG, note 28 for more explanation. Also: “Aspects of the Principate of Tiberius”, Historical comments on the Colonial coinage issued outside Spain, Michael Grant- The American Numismatic Society – Numismatic Notes and Monographs(1950) There are some issues with inscriptions and dating in Banti Simonetti.
These are the only coins that show a portrait of Caligula pre-principate! The coin is dated to maybe 32-33? RPC 182. The importance of this coin is invaluable towards any study of Caligulan pre-principate portraiture. There are no pre-principate portraits (sculpted) of Caligula excepted by Art historians. C · CAESAR · TI · N · QVINQ · IN · V · I · N · K ·
Joe Geranio
Julio Claudian Iconographic Association
For problems with the dating of Tiberian Coinage see RPC and A. Banti and L. Simonetti, Corpus Nummorum Romanorum (XIII Florence: 1977 pp. 141-50 deal with dating to 34 A.D. (PolliniJWAG, note 28 for more explanation. Also: “Aspects of the Principate of Tiberius”, Historical comments on the Colonial coinage issued outside Spain, Michael Grant- The American Numismatic Society – Numismatic Notes and Monographs(1950) There are some issues with inscriptions and dating in Banti Simonetti.
These are the only coins that show a portrait of Caligula pre-principate! The coin is dated to maybe 32-33? RPC 182. The importance of this coin is invaluable towards any study of Caligulan pre-principate portraiture. There are no pre-principate portraits (sculpted) of Caligula excepted by Art historians. C · CAESAR · TI · N · QVINQ · IN · V · I · N · K ·
Joe Geranio
Julio Claudian Iconographic Association