Comments

  Brutus2345 27. Feb. 2015, 08:50
This is a true extreme rarity in Roman Coinage even the British museum doesn't have one.
  antikpeter 26. Feb. 2015, 22:22
Im Namen von..= in Vertretung, im Auftrag . Warum sollte Kd.E. so einfältig gewesen sein, den Gegenkönig Ro. zu beauftragen, seine Münzen zu prägen? Raoul und spätere Herrscher haben solch schweren Denare nicht geprägt.
Die Keile sind auch keine Keile, sondern wahrscheinlich abgedriftete Teile des Kreuzes., mbG pn
  antikpeter 24. Feb. 2015, 22:33
Die Inschrift lautet : A/ CARLUS REX - ohne R hinter REX, Von diesem Typ kommen wenige
Münzen vor , alle mit Gewicht um 1,60 g. Die REX R-Münzen sind leichter und zeitlich später: pn
  amele 19. Feb. 2015, 06:19
ion erythrai
  siliquae 16. Feb. 2015, 18:37
Erreur sur l'atelier : Pas Thessalonique, mais Constantinople...
  anjue 16. Feb. 2015, 15:31
falsch
  xanthos 15. Feb. 2015, 22:42
Fake
  xanthos 15. Feb. 2015, 22:40
Fake
  xanthos 15. Feb. 2015, 22:40
Fake
  xanthos 15. Feb. 2015, 22:32
Fake coin:
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-5491
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-4564
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-7562
  cyls 8. Feb. 2015, 12:34
No ! This interpretation is completely wrong ! Summer 391 ?!? This coin was issued in AD 190 (not 192)
  cyls 8. Feb. 2015, 12:30
What a lot of nonsense in this description. A good example of how "cut and paste" should not be used !
  nomisma 28. Jan. 2015, 16:32
The photograph is of an histamenon of Isaac I Comnenus.
  sujit_kumar 24. Jan. 2015, 21:54
i have same type but ruler name?
  oosheen 23. Jan. 2015, 15:36
Fantastic!
  Pscipio 23. Jan. 2015, 10:53
A fake from modern dies.
  Pscipio 22. Jan. 2015, 22:24
A modern copy.
  xanthos 17. Jan. 2015, 22:28
It is a denarius (not an antoninianus) which is very rare.
  ibrahim 17. Jan. 2015, 15:58
What is different this coin others
  ibrahim 17. Jan. 2015, 15:57
It is vrry huk
  xanthos 14. Jan. 2015, 20:41
Fake coin. The reverse die is identical to this fake:
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-4248
  aestasaestatum 11. Jan. 2015, 19:01
Falsche Beschreibung: Korrekt ist Semissis, Sear 1459
  MICHAEL1956 8. Jan. 2015, 17:48
There are some areas of verdigris on the reverse which may explain why it was only graded GVF.
  MICHAEL1956 8. Jan. 2015, 17:43
The low realisation will be due to the severe edge knock between 7 and 8 o'clock on the reverse.
An edge knock of that severity should always be referred to explicitly in the description; simply marking it down to Very Fine isn't adequate.
  MICHAEL1956 8. Jan. 2015, 17:37
This medal has quite a significant edge knock at 3 o'clock obverse - presumably missed by the grader and certainly by the bidder. A cased example of this medal, graded GEF sold at the same auction for less - £850.