Actually 'modern' counterfeit but still interesting Fourrée good for a study. As i know and believe all other specimens are made with normal silver planchets.
Roland
6. June 2019, 22:36
MAXIMINUS THRAX (235-238) Ez nem inkább SESTERTIUS?
Seleukos
3. June 2019, 11:40
The NGC assessment of smoothing is incorrect. The left field reverse has a different surface texture (smooth) due to the erasure of the anchor from the die and the effective resurfacing of this field of the die. This has imparted a smoother surface on the left field reverse on the strike compared to the rest of the reverse where die wear, sustained prior to the anchor erasure, has imparted a rougher surface on the strike.
voukelj
27. May 2019, 13:18
This coin is also from the collection of Charles Gillet photofile 467 (this coin).
Maurizio
25. May 2019, 12:50
NO Crawford 516/4 but 516/5
Maurizio
25. May 2019, 10:58
NO Crawford 511/3b , but 511/3a
Maurizio
25. May 2019, 10:57
NO Crawford 511/3b , but 511/3a
rorey36
22. May 2019, 17:25
Phaselis is in Lycia.
rorey36
22. May 2019, 17:23
Phaselis /Lycia not Lydia.
Dude_199
6. May 2019, 12:21
Ex. davor Adolph E. Cahn, Auktion 78, 15. September 1932, Los Nr. 1363.
Nach Lanz bei Westfälische Auktionsgesellschaft OHG, Auktion 75, 24./25.11.2015, Los Nr. 3872 versteigert.
Maurizio
2. May 2019, 16:36
mistake, RIC 405 not RIC 404
coinscollector
2. May 2019, 02:40
Similar to the coin published in Fernández, Fernández & Calicó, Catálogo Monográfico de los Denarios de la República Romana (2002);
Bodvoc
1. May 2019, 04:24
Appears to be Poey d' Avant 5984.
montgoej
25. Apr. 2019, 06:17
This is actually a Crawford 45/2 as opposed to 44/6
rayban35
23. Apr. 2019, 11:07
cette monnaie n'est pas du tout pour Cyzique (SMKE), mais pour Arles (PARL)
Nach Lanz bei Westfälische Auktionsgesellschaft OHG, Auktion 75, 24./25.11.2015, Los Nr. 3872 versteigert.