I have trouble with accepting this piece as legitimate. The style of the portrait on the obverse and the image of Athena on the reverse are stylistically different than from antiquity. They resemble more Baroque creations from the middle of the eighteenth century than from the third century BC.
The block "A" also concerns me, once again totally different than seen from the third century BC.
Have there been any others of this type discovered?

date at coin is 1708, but search show item as a 1704 DENGA.

Nice

Cheap one to be honest

The wrong description seems to be linked to this image.

310 euros sans frais

A very nice piece. Well worth the price.

A rare variation without the letter O and end of the word
Quint in the date. Should read "QUINTO"

A cataloging error. The date is 1419.

A very nice example of the first collectible Early Dated coin. The
lucky winner got a bargain!!

Wrong coin/despcription

This example is a forgery

This same coin is being offered at Nomisma auction 51 as lot 434, starting at €. 100,000, which represents a more than 100% increase as compared to the price realized 5 months earlier at Baldwin's auction of the Lindèn collection.

Es ist ein Tremissis der Ostgoten. Wohl Mzst. Mailand. vgl. Metlich 2004 für die Büstenform. Legende der Rückseite fehlerhaft (VICTORIA AVCVSTORAM (z.T. retrograd?)

coorect date . not true

Great Zeus.

Excellent reverse style! Certainly one of the finest!

first 2 letter damged

it is 190 not 170

j ai trouvé la meme , et aimerai la vendre .

Endlich kommt wieder so ein ähnlich schönes Stück in der Hess Divo Herbstauktion 2014.

A modern cast fake, known to me in several specimens.

I was the buyer of this coin. Unfortunately, it was stolen in a burglary and is still missing.

This is probably a modern fantasy coin.

This is probably a modern fantasy coin.