This coin illustrated in Banti - Simonetti "Corpus Nummorum Romanorum" Volume XVII (No. 510). The Sir Charles Oman Collection was sold in Christies auction 02/07/1968. Coin offered afterwards by C. de Nicola in listino 4/1969 (n. 402).

Smoothed and tooled

RIC 890 of Cyzicus, p. 115.

RIC 890 of Cyzicus, p. 115.

Same coin as Lanz 120 545: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=173555

Un faux moderne des ateliers "bulgares", dont le même coin de revers a été utilisé pour Gratien et Valens. Voir les fiches sur la base siliquae :
http://www.siliques.fr/SILIQUAE_WEB/fichemonnaie/00309.htm
http://www.siliques.fr/SILIQUAE_WEB/fichemonnaie/01289.htm
http://www.siliques.fr/SILIQUAE_WEB/fichemonnaie/00092.htm
Siliquae

Un faux moderne des ateliers "bulgares", dont le même coin de revers a été utilisé pour Gratien et Valens. Voir les fiches sur la base siliquae :
http://www.siliques.fr/SILIQUAE_WEB/fichemonnaie/00309.htm
http://www.siliques.fr/SILIQUAE_WEB/fichemonnaie/01289.htm
http://www.siliques.fr/SILIQUAE_WEB/fichemonnaie/00092.htm
Siliquae

1715 ;)

Fantastic!

1715. :O
I can see how this was mistaken. The 5 is sunk a bit deeply in the die, showing the line from the round point that sunk the loop in the 5 punch. Fantastic date! A hard one to find for this series.

I believe this is 1718, for the monogram is the style of the period (condensed monogram with short foot L, or "no serif L") the type 3 monogram of P5 for Lima Half Real coinage. Type 1 being the 1702 large "Bogota type" type 2 being the 1702-1717. The change takes place in 1718, oddly. The lions are also the type of 1717-18, with the castles being the type of 1717-1720. :) Just making a note for collectors.

Wolfhard v. Roth-Wackernitz (1288-1302)

The attribution to Hildebad is wishful thinking. This coin should definitely not be attributed to Hildebad, for whom no coins are known. The style is much later than that of 540/41. This is more likely an imitative coin of the late 6th century.

RIC 706. p. 92. RIC 712 is listed with Rx. PAX AVGVSTI.

RIC 706. p. 92. RIC 712 is listed with Rx. PAX AVGVSTI.

RIC 706. p. 92. RIC 712 is listed with Rx. PAX AVGVSTI.

RIC 704, p. 92. 711 is listed as PAX AVGVSTI, p. 93.

RIC 704, p. 92. 711 is listed as PAX AVGVSTI, p. 93.

RIC 709, p. 93. RIC 705 is listed with obverse titulature IMP C M AVR PROBVS AVG, p. 92.

RIC 704, p. 92. 711 is listed as PAX AVGVSTI, p. 93.

A well known and quite obvious Slavey reproduction: http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-6902

Hindenburg?

Pforzheim statt Pfortsheim.

Das ist nicht Bismarck, sondern Dürer.

Coin of Ticinum, part of the EQVITI series. RIC 517, p. 72.

Obviously Severus Alexander.